15:I[18313,["/_next/static/chunks/3lc7vgunqd_rw.js","/_next/static/chunks/258jvll10h-3v.js","/_next/static/chunks/1bj-av9ysg3y1.js","/_next/static/chunks/0mvlzvvdbl276.js","/_next/static/chunks/19pif-88tkd8b.js","/_next/static/chunks/3z7qfkygc9fzx.js"],"ItemProvider"] 14:T401,{ "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Article", "description": "Circulating around there are some arguments that the Temple of Zeus is engaging in valuable work, promoting sanity, true spirituality, union with the Gods, and the divine teachings of the foundations ", "headline": "When Does The Hypocrisy End? Never? - Library of Thoth", "author": { "@type": "Person", "name": "High Priest Zevios Metathronos" }, "datePublished": "2026-09-09T11:18:13.000Z", "dateModified": "2026-10-11T21:23:18.369Z", "articleSection": "ToZ Community and Activism", "wordCount": 1241, "mainEntityOfPage": { "@id": "https://libraryofthoth.org/item/sermon/309069-when-does-the-hypocrisy-end-never", "@type": "WebPage" }, "publisher": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Organization", "logo": "https://zeusisgod.org/assets/img/logo-zeus.png", "name": "Temple of Zeus", "sameAs": [ "https://templeofzeus.org" ], "url": "https://templeofzeus.org" } }16:T1eff,Circulating around there are some arguments that the Temple of Zeus is engaging in valuable work, promoting sanity, true spirituality, union with the Gods, and the divine teachings of the foundations of the Western Philosophy. Some sheltered lesser-than's, dare to also criticize these approaches, of all sources, of Temple of Zeus. Typically, these come from the lands of the most hypocrisy there is; namely the sheltered "Western World". The Western World wokes up, in it's ethically empty proponents, to fight the foundations of it. This is the epitome of apparent intelligence in it as well. People pretend they stand appalled at the Temple of Zeus, me as it's founder, or how dare I resurrect the memory of Aristotle and the Ancient Gods alongside people who worship reason, discourse and science, with the highest spirituality the world has ever seen as the source of existence. What a shocker, indeed. Freedom fighters as well, are very appalled on the Temple of Zeus; they are however not appalled by phenomena such as those displayed below. The same people aren't shocked however, about the reality in front of their eyes. Time wasted on me from the "freedom fighters", because they are not freedom fighters, they are fighters against freedom itself. If something is reasonable and it can improve society, a vendetta instantly is created against it. Mr. Zevios becomes their problem and preoccupation 24/7 because they care about all of you. In the meantime, they would not dare say 2 words about radical Islam, lest they disappear by accident by any such notions. Keep it on Mr. Zevios instead. I suggest to these people to legally and respecfully listen to my advice: You ought go copulate yourselves in your hypocritical, non alleged as such, but opinionated (personal opinions do not reflect Temple opinions) righteousness. Elegantly put, you can also, according to sexologists, use finger insertion, up the rear placidus of the rear end of the body: However as a not licensed professional, there is no much else I can say on this. Ensure you find a licensed medical professional or sexologist, especially if you suffer from mental issues against Mr. Zevios and the Temple of Zeus when the below phenomena are everywhere in your land. Speaking of copulation, it might also help with the alarmingly low birthrates, for which neither the Temple of Zeus, nor Mr. Zevios specifically, does have credit. But spend all your day opposing him don't forget about this. I wouldn't write of course "go fuck yourselves" because that would be using slur language; yet I write this here to describe what I wouldn't say, if I didn't advise formally that copulation can indeed help with already dwindling psychological help, which might, according to psychologists, devolve all the way down to lack of emotional stability to such extent, that one would have problems with the Temple of Zeus and devote a life against it, rather than for example, concern about their human rights. In the meantime, as I have already advised and legally disclaimed in a formal way, here is a Muslim leader in a video below, that I on reasonable basis have to indicate, explains that "Jihad is not only about killing" (because it is but it's not all of it) publicly, in English, with a paper behind him with a literal bank account. That's acceptable and all good; very moral and related. Behind him, besides the bank account, he very confidently explains to you, your daily Jihad advice. Granted some people ask why we respectfully reserve our rights, human rights and in belief, religious rights, I say a strong assessment has to be made first about the incidental beliefs which increasingly increase in the Western World, supporting these, easy to find, via a simplified Chatgpt research, below, also supplemented. If the things below are allowed, then we reserve the rights to consider allowed speech about the Ancient Gods and Aristotle as well. Until the day where these are "addressed" in a reasonable manner (likely never, due to cowardice and moral nepotism, bundled with Western Hypocrisy), the Temple of Zeus retains the rights to have minimal and reasonable faith, albeit, law abiding positioning regardless, to the standards set up by the Western World. While we seriously question if these rights even exist at this point, we respect them: but do they respect themselves? Currently, in the Western World, to avoid the conversation on the objective danger of allowing these religious beliefs free reign, we just have emotional buzzwords: "Islamophobia" and related emotionally based disabling mechanisms of speech. You can't question this; it's Islamophobia. The same proponents which supposedly care about human rights, rights of freedom and religion, indeed are the greatest protectors of the religious proponents who most ardently stand by their definition against them. In part only some of the definitions, these are below. On one side they chant "Gay rights and Islamophobia" in the same sentence, while in a categorically dominated world by what they protect, gay people would have no future or literally according to their doctrine, no existence either. Such interpolations and hypocrisies therefore, are not part of the hypocrisies the Temple of Zeus and the Religion of Reason that we represent, would like to discuss: but rather we comment on this, so that people understand the notion of our decisions to remain outside of the sphere of the insanity these bipolar irrationality represents. Behold below a commentary on this: YouTube video Apostates: Muslims who leave Islam. An explicit killing command appears in Sahih al-Bukhari 3017. - Adulterers with qualifying marital status: People committing unlawful intercourse who meet the legal conditions for the capital penalty. Sahih al-Bukhari 6878. - Intentional murderers: Subject to execution through qisas, with pardon or financial settlement available under the relevant rules. Qur’an 2:178. - Perpetrators of hirabah: Violent bandits and comparable offenders classified as waging war against God and His Messenger and spreading corruption. Death and crucifixion are among the prescribed penalties, alongside noncapital alternatives. Qur’an 5:33–34. - Men convicted of male–male intercourse: Capital punishment appears in hadith and several classical legal positions; the schools disagree about the applicable punishment. Jamiʿ at-Tirmidhi 1456. - People convicted of insulting Muhammad or other capital forms of blasphemy: Classical doctrines prescribe death in specified cases. A hadith explicitly approves a killing for repeatedly insulting Muhammad. Sunan Abi Dawud 4361. - People convicted of sorcery: Execution is prescribed in some doctrines; others distinguish sorcery involving unbelief or killing from other alleged practices. Traditional ruling on sorcery. - Muslims who persistently abandon obligatory prayer: Execution is prescribed in some schools after the relevant demands to repent or resume prayer. This is not a unanimous ruling. Ruling discussing the different positions. - Spies assisting an enemy against Muslims: Execution is permitted under some juristic positions, with distinctions concerning the spy’s status and circumstances. Traditional capital-punishment ruling. The military categories are separate because an order to fight is not an order to execute every member: - Polytheists covered by Qur’an 9’s military proclamation: Explicit killing, capture, and siege commands, with treaty and safe-conduct provisions in the surrounding verses. Qur’an 9:4–6. - People of the Book covered by Qur’an 9:29: Ordered to be fought until payment of jizya in submission. This is not a blanket death sentence for Jews and Christians. Qur’an 9:29. - Armed rebels or an aggressing Muslim faction: To be fought until they cease their aggression or return to compliance; the verse then commands reconciliation. Qur’an 49:9.17:T242d,

Circulating around there are some arguments that the Temple of Zeus is engaging in valuable work, promoting sanity, true spirituality, union with the Gods, and the divine teachings of the foundations of the Western Philosophy. Some sheltered lesser-than's, dare to also criticize these approaches, of all sources, of Temple of Zeus.

Typically, these come from the lands of the most hypocrisy there is; namely the sheltered "Western World". The Western World wokes up, in it's ethically empty proponents, to fight the foundations of it. This is the epitome of apparent intelligence in it as well.

People pretend they stand appalled at the Temple of Zeus, me as it's founder, or how dare I resurrect the memory of Aristotle and the Ancient Gods alongside people who worship reason, discourse and science, with the highest spirituality the world has ever seen as the source of existence. What a shocker, indeed. Freedom fighters as well, are very appalled on the Temple of Zeus; they are however not appalled by phenomena such as those displayed below.

The same people aren't shocked however, about the reality in front of their eyes. Time wasted on me from the "freedom fighters", because they are not freedom fighters, they are fighters against freedom itself. If something is reasonable and it can improve society, a vendetta instantly is created against it. Mr. Zevios becomes their problem and preoccupation 24/7 because they care about all of you. In the meantime, they would not dare say 2 words about radical Islam, lest they disappear by accident by any such notions. Keep it on Mr. Zevios instead.

I suggest to these people to legally and respecfully listen to my advice: You ought go copulate yourselves in your hypocritical, non alleged as such, but opinionated (personal opinions do not reflect Temple opinions) righteousness. Elegantly put, you can also, according to sexologists, use finger insertion, up the rear placidus of the rear end of the body: However as a not licensed professional, there is no much else I can say on this.

Ensure you find a licensed medical professional or sexologist, especially if you suffer from mental issues against Mr. Zevios and the Temple of Zeus when the below phenomena are everywhere in your land. Speaking of copulation, it might also help with the alarmingly low birthrates, for which neither the Temple of Zeus, nor Mr. Zevios specifically, does have credit. But spend all your day opposing him don't forget about this.

I wouldn't write of course "go fuck yourselves" because that would be using slur language; yet I write this here to describe what I wouldn't say, if I didn't advise formally that copulation can indeed help with already dwindling psychological help, which might, according to psychologists, devolve all the way down to lack of emotional stability to such extent, that one would have problems with the Temple of Zeus and devote a life against it, rather than for example, concern about their human rights.

In the meantime, as I have already advised and legally disclaimed in a formal way, here is a Muslim leader in a video below, that I on reasonable basis have to indicate, explains that "Jihad is not only about killing" (because it is but it's not all of it) publicly, in English, with a paper behind him with a literal bank account. That's acceptable and all good; very moral and related. Behind him, besides the bank account, he very confidently explains to you, your daily Jihad advice.

Granted some people ask why we respectfully reserve our rights, human rights and in belief, religious rights, I say a strong assessment has to be made first about the incidental beliefs which increasingly increase in the Western World, supporting these, easy to find, via a simplified Chatgpt research, below, also supplemented.

If the things below are allowed, then we reserve the rights to consider allowed speech about the Ancient Gods and Aristotle as well.

Until the day where these are "addressed" in a reasonable manner (likely never, due to cowardice and moral nepotism, bundled with Western Hypocrisy), the Temple of Zeus retains the rights to have minimal and reasonable faith, albeit, law abiding positioning regardless, to the standards set up by the Western World.

While we seriously question if these rights even exist at this point, we respect them: but do they respect themselves?

Currently, in the Western World, to avoid the conversation on the objective danger of allowing these religious beliefs free reign, we just have emotional buzzwords: "Islamophobia" and related emotionally based disabling mechanisms of speech. You can't question this; it's Islamophobia. The same proponents which supposedly care about human rights, rights of freedom and religion, indeed are the greatest protectors of the religious proponents who most ardently stand by their definition against them. In part only some of the definitions, these are below.

On one side they chant "Gay rights and Islamophobia" in the same sentence, while in a categorically dominated world by what they protect, gay people would have no future or literally according to their doctrine, no existence either. Such interpolations and hypocrisies therefore, are not part of the hypocrisies the Temple of Zeus and the Religion of Reason that we represent, would like to discuss: but rather we comment on this, so that people understand the notion of our decisions to remain outside of the sphere of the insanity these bipolar irrationality represents.

Behold below a commentary on this:

YouTube video

Apostates: Muslims who leave Islam. An explicit killing command appears in Sahih al-Bukhari 3017.

Adulterers with qualifying marital status: People committing unlawful intercourse who meet the legal conditions for the capital penalty. Sahih al-Bukhari 6878.
Intentional murderers: Subject to execution through qisas, with pardon or financial settlement available under the relevant rules. Qur’an 2:178.
Perpetrators of hirabah: Violent bandits and comparable offenders classified as waging war against God and His Messenger and spreading corruption. Death and crucifixion are among the prescribed penalties, alongside noncapital alternatives. Qur’an 5:33–34.
Men convicted of male–male intercourse: Capital punishment appears in hadith and several classical legal positions; the schools disagree about the applicable punishment. Jamiʿ at-Tirmidhi 1456.
People convicted of insulting Muhammad or other capital forms of blasphemy: Classical doctrines prescribe death in specified cases. A hadith explicitly approves a killing for repeatedly insulting Muhammad. Sunan Abi Dawud 4361.
People convicted of sorcery: Execution is prescribed in some doctrines; others distinguish sorcery involving unbelief or killing from other alleged practices. Traditional ruling on sorcery.
Muslims who persistently abandon obligatory prayer: Execution is prescribed in some schools after the relevant demands to repent or resume prayer. This is not a unanimous ruling. Ruling discussing the different positions.
Spies assisting an enemy against Muslims: Execution is permitted under some juristic positions, with distinctions concerning the spy’s status and circumstances. Traditional capital-punishment ruling.

The military categories are separate because an order to fight is not an order to execute every member:

Polytheists covered by Qur’an 9’s military proclamation: Explicit killing, capture, and siege commands, with treaty and safe-conduct provisions in the surrounding verses. Qur’an 9:4–6.
People of the Book covered by Qur’an 9:29: Ordered to be fought until payment of jizya in submission. This is not a blanket death sentence for Jews and Christians. Qur’an 9:29.
Armed rebels or an aggressing Muslim faction: To be fought until they cease their aggression or return to compliance; the verse then commands reconciliation. Qur’an 49:9.

18:T242d,

If the things below are allowed, then we reserve the rights to consider allowed speech about the Ancient Gods and Aristotle as well.

While we seriously question if these rights even exist at this point, we respect them: but do they respect themselves?

Behold below a commentary on this:

YouTube video

Apostates: Muslims who leave Islam. An explicit killing command appears in Sahih al-Bukhari 3017.

Adulterers with qualifying marital status: People committing unlawful intercourse who meet the legal conditions for the capital penalty. Sahih al-Bukhari 6878.
Intentional murderers: Subject to execution through qisas, with pardon or financial settlement available under the relevant rules. Qur’an 2:178.
Perpetrators of hirabah: Violent bandits and comparable offenders classified as waging war against God and His Messenger and spreading corruption. Death and crucifixion are among the prescribed penalties, alongside noncapital alternatives. Qur’an 5:33–34.
Men convicted of male–male intercourse: Capital punishment appears in hadith and several classical legal positions; the schools disagree about the applicable punishment. Jamiʿ at-Tirmidhi 1456.
People convicted of insulting Muhammad or other capital forms of blasphemy: Classical doctrines prescribe death in specified cases. A hadith explicitly approves a killing for repeatedly insulting Muhammad. Sunan Abi Dawud 4361.
People convicted of sorcery: Execution is prescribed in some doctrines; others distinguish sorcery involving unbelief or killing from other alleged practices. Traditional ruling on sorcery.
Muslims who persistently abandon obligatory prayer: Execution is prescribed in some schools after the relevant demands to repent or resume prayer. This is not a unanimous ruling. Ruling discussing the different positions.
Spies assisting an enemy against Muslims: Execution is permitted under some juristic positions, with distinctions concerning the spy’s status and circumstances. Traditional capital-punishment ruling.

The military categories are separate because an order to fight is not an order to execute every member:

Polytheists covered by Qur’an 9’s military proclamation: Explicit killing, capture, and siege commands, with treaty and safe-conduct provisions in the surrounding verses. Qur’an 9:4–6.
People of the Book covered by Qur’an 9:29: Ordered to be fought until payment of jizya in submission. This is not a blanket death sentence for Jews and Christians. Qur’an 9:29.
Armed rebels or an aggressing Muslim faction: To be fought until they cease their aggression or return to compliance; the verse then commands reconciliation. Qur’an 49:9.

5:[["$","script",null,{"dangerouslySetInnerHTML":{"__html":"$14"},"type":"application/ld+json"}],["$","script",null,{"dangerouslySetInnerHTML":{"__html":"{\n \"@context\": \"https://schema.org\",\n \"@type\": \"BreadcrumbList\",\n \"itemListElement\": [\n {\n \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n \"item\": \"https://libraryofthoth.org\",\n \"name\": \"Home\",\n \"position\": 1\n },\n {\n \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n \"item\": \"https://libraryofthoth.org/browse?fc=1y3de4n\",\n \"name\": \"ToZ Community and Activism\",\n \"position\": 2\n },\n {\n \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n \"item\": \"https://libraryofthoth.org/item/sermon/309069-when-does-the-hypocrisy-end-never\",\n \"name\": \"When Does The Hypocrisy End? Never?\",\n \"position\": 3\n }\n ]\n}"},"type":"application/ld+json"}],["$","$L15",null,{"data":{"meta":{"author":"High Priest Zevios Metathronos","category":"ToZ Community and Activism","date":"2026-09-09T11:18:13.000Z","external_source_url":"https://ancient-forums.com/threads/when-does-the-hypocrisy-end-never.309069","self_file_name":"309069-when-does-the-hypocrisy-end-never.json","stripped_html":"$16","title":"When Does The Hypocrisy End? Never?","transformed_html":"$17","type":"sermon","untransformed_html":"$18"},"taxonomy":{"author":{"isClergy":true,"label":"High Priest Zevios Metathronos","order":1,"priority":100,"slug":"high-priest-zevios-metathronos","id":"15wdqcz"},"category":{"color":"blue","direction":"direct","group":3,"label":"ToZ Community and Activism","order":9,"priority":60,"slug":"toz-community-and-activism","id":"1y3de4n"},"type":{"label":"Sermon","order":1,"priority":10,"slug":"sermon","id":"a8yqc1"}}},"pdfSize":"1.0 MB","pdfUrl":"/catalog/sermon/toz-community-and-activism/high-priest-zevios-metathronos/2026/309069-when-does-the-hypocrisy-end-never.pdf","children":"$L19"}]]